Stink · 12-28-2007, 10:30 AM

i'm debating which way to go as far as billing is concerned.

does anyone have any thoughts on the matter?

pro's and con's.....

can anyone tell me if there are charging by the linear foot, what the typical price difference is between charging by the linear ft. to sq. ft.

thanks,

p

bob · 12-28-2007, 11:01 AM

You need to do both. Charge for printing by square foot of image area but charge for media by linear foot of media unrolled. I charge whatever I charge per square foot for printing regardless of media, it varies based on size. Then I charge 200% of cost for whatever media I unroll for the job.

When you separate the media from the printing, it makes pricing a lot simpler and more consistent.

12-28-2007, 10:30 AM	#1
Stink Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 3 Printer: HP Z6100;HP 9000s	sq.ft. vs. Ln. ft. i'm debating which way to go as far as billing is concerned. does anyone have any thoughts on the matter? pro's and con's..... can anyone tell me if there are charging by the linear foot, what the typical price difference is between charging by the linear ft. to sq. ft. thanks, p

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-28-2007, 11:01 AM	#2
bob Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 157 Printer: Mutoh Falcon Outdoor 48	You need to do both. Charge for printing by square foot of image area but charge for media by linear foot of media unrolled. I charge whatever I charge per square foot for printing regardless of media, it varies based on size. Then I charge 200% of cost for whatever media I unroll for the job. When you separate the media from the printing, it makes pricing a lot simpler and more consistent.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)